Just Wondering?

It's not the flywheel torque that's 50% less but the roadwheel torque.

If you consider how well the car accelerates in first gear compared to how poorly it accelerates in fifth gear, this is all the result of different gearing of the same engine.

If the engine produces, say, 150lb/ft of torque at 2000rpm it'll do that regardless what gear it's in. What the gearbox does with this however is crucial. Short gear ratios (low gears) convert the 2000rpm into something much, much slower - the engine can rev it's proverbials off but the road wheels turn fairly slowly, hence a low top speed on the rev limiter in first gear. Total energy out equals total energy in (ignoring powertrain losses which don't really vary with gear ratios) so if your RPM goes from 2000rpm into the gearbox to 200rpm out of the gearbox, then the torque of 150lb/ft in has the opposite applied to it, and would be multiplied up to 1,500lb/ft of torque.

Short gear ratios step down the RPM and multiply the torque. Tall gear ratios do the opposite.

Ignoring the fact that the engine can actually generate more torque at 3000rpm than 2000rpm and just assuming it's a completely flat torque curve like an electric motor has, then the simple act of re-gearing the gearbox to give 70mph's worth of road wheel RPM for a 50% lower flywheel RPM (i.e. less step-down of RPM from engine to wheels) means that you get 50% less multiplication of the engine's torque at 2000rpm compared to 3000rpm.

The engine produces the torque and RPM certainly, but it's what the gearbox spits out at the other end that you actually drive with.

You're spot on about fuel economy though. Practically all naturally aspirated petrol engines are at their highest efficiency at full-throttle. At full throttle pumping losses across the throttle body are minimised and these can be significant. The best way to use minimum fuel is to open the throttle wide and change the gearing to reduce engine RPM to bring the actual power output down to what's required. That would need a gear which gave you absolutely nothing to spare to fight headwinds, inclines etc with though. It is however how piston aeroplane engines are operated - full throttle and variable pitch propeller used to drag the engine RPM down to something like 60~75% power output.
 
Well having a Mondy TDDi 2ltr, I can say that I had thought about shoving the same engine into my coug - only because I was thinking about just having one car instead of two. However, I love my V6 and couldn't ever part with it. My Mondy although only being the 115bhp variant is actually quite quick and has loads of torque, especially when going up hills. I can literally buzz past people on a dual carriageway/motorway hills in 5th gear (mine is the 5 speed, and not the 6 speed box) and she just keeps pulling. At 80mph my rev counter in the Mondy reads 2600rpm, whereas in my coug it reads over 3200rpm in the same gear and doesn't pull like the my Mondy does, yeh ok, it may have something to do with the turbo on the Mondy, but even so.
 
Having driven a few diesel cars, the one thing that still irritates me is pulling off, they are still seem to have that hesitancy about them, on boost, they are great but off boost, pulling away, they can be a little scary.

I drove a Fiat Multipla on holiday in Ibiza and was pretty impressed with mpg, with 6 adults in it pulled really well too, believe me, I gave it some stick and even with 65ish stones in it, the car was brilliant. The looks aren't that great, but it did everything I asked of it with ease.
 
It's not the flywheel torque that's 50% less but the roadwheel torque.

If you consider how well the car accelerates in first gear compared to how poorly it accelerates in fifth gear, this is all the result of different gearing of the same engine.

If the engine produces, say, 150lb/ft of torque at 2000rpm it'll do that regardless what gear it's in. What the gearbox does with this however is crucial. Short gear ratios (low gears) convert the 2000rpm into something much, much slower - the engine can rev it's proverbials off but the road wheels turn fairly slowly, hence a low top speed on the rev limiter in first gear. Total energy out equals total energy in (ignoring powertrain losses which don't really vary with gear ratios) so if your RPM goes from 2000rpm into the gearbox to 200rpm out of the gearbox, then the torque of 150lb/ft in has the opposite applied to it, and would be multiplied up to 1,500lb/ft of torque.

Short gear ratios step down the RPM and multiply the torque. Tall gear ratios do the opposite.

Ignoring the fact that the engine can actually generate more torque at 3000rpm than 2000rpm and just assuming it's a completely flat torque curve like an electric motor has, then the simple act of re-gearing the gearbox to give 70mph's worth of road wheel RPM for a 50% lower flywheel RPM (i.e. less step-down of RPM from engine to wheels) means that you get 50% less multiplication of the engine's torque at 2000rpm compared to 3000rpm.

The engine produces the torque and RPM certainly, but it's what the gearbox spits out at the other end that you actually drive with.

You're spot on about fuel economy though. Practically all naturally aspirated petrol engines are at their highest efficiency at full-throttle. At full throttle pumping losses across the throttle body are minimised and these can be significant. The best way to use minimum fuel is to open the throttle wide and change the gearing to reduce engine RPM to bring the actual power output down to what's required. That would need a gear which gave you absolutely nothing to spare to fight headwinds, inclines etc with though. It is however how piston aeroplane engines are operated - full throttle and variable pitch propeller used to drag the engine RPM down to something like 60~75% power output.

Aha OK thanks for that. I knew piston engined aircraft generally worked at high revs and variable pitch props but I never knew why. Learn something every day.
Cheers matey