how about the basic facts. cougar lights, particularly c1 are crap, and HID's make it much safer for the driver and other members of the public too.
To say someone who needs HID's should actually consider a trip to specsavers instead is a ridiculous statement to make.
I think the word "
needs" may actually point to an issue. If you "
need" HIDS to be able to drive your car at night, then yes, I think a visit to an optician
may be one avenue to explore.
HIDs can often when used with incorrect lamps (and as I've mentioned, I've not seen the HID light output on a Cougar lamp) can also be irritating to other road users and dazzle oncoming traffic? Do you not agree?
The "fact" of the lamp output being poor is conjecture, not fact if you really want to continue a semantic argument, I don't particularly?!
Surely it would be safer for all concerned to know that drivers' vision is also reasonably sound? Do you see my point or am I explaining this poorly?
Essentially, I don't want a debate about this, people are born of freewill to do as they wish.... I was just trying to make the point (albeit badly) that if a driver
needs the extra light output afforded by HIDS simply to drive... then they
may have an issue?
Also if the light quality from the dipped beams
is poor then surely you'd be using these in street lit areas or when there is passing traffic anyway?
Regards,
Andy