People with more money than sense maybe?
Example:
You buy a used car, from a previous owner with three months tax on it. That three months is collected by DVLA ie: government?
You take ownership of same car and have to tax it again. Unless you are lucky enough to sell that car on at the point of tax renewal, not only do you as a seller/owner get shafted again, but so does the new owner/buyer.
RIP-OFF!!!
Is this actually how it'll work though, it is a duty so it only has a liability to the registered keeper not the former owner.
I would suggest that the former owner is entitled to a refund of any duty held on that vehicle, are they not?
Correct me if I'm wrong...
The only difference is that the duty is not transferable anymore.... It'll mean you can't buy a "taxed" car anymore.... Similarly you won't have to queue up in a post office anymore, you'll be able to sort it out 24 hours a day, 365 days a year and it'll also greatly streamline the refunds process.
The SORN regs didn't change to my understanding having read the appropriate acts, I think it was misinterpreted en-massé. Car 'taxed' means it requires insurance,
there wasn't and never has been a duty to maintain third-party insurance on a car declared SORN and off the public highway.
As said though, I've used 'laid-up' cover before.
Present company excepted, but generally most of this stuff comes 144th hand on a forum then gets endlessly repeated without anybody checking the
actual law.