w00t! Shiny new ticket, and not a single advisory, (though "If you're going to do that big brake conversion, I recommend you do it soonish...").
Frank noticed that tiny popped seam in my outer sill (probably) from where I was rear-ended, but said it's not a failure because a) It's not rusty and b) It's no different from a sill-drain. I'm going to need welding next year though.
Now for the interesting bit. We had some discussion last year about what effect the ST200 conversion would have on consumption and emissions. Well my consumption has decreased by a couple of MPG, i.e. I'm getting better mileage especially on a long motorway run, but check this out...
[TABLE="class: grid, width: 500, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD]
Measurement[/TD]
[TD]
Legal Limit
[/TD]
[TD]
Tiger 2015
[/TD]
[TD]
Tiger 2016
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Carbon Monoxide (%)[/TD]
[TD]0.200[/TD]
[TD]0.054[/TD]
[TD]0.000[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Hydrocarbons (ppm)[/TD]
[TD]200[/TD]
[TD]29[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Lambda[/TD]
[TD]0.970 - 1.030[/TD]
[TD]1.005[/TD]
[TD]1.020[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
All other things being equal - I still have all three cats, but of course they're a year older - the breathing mods (and leaving the white injectors in place) have actually brought down the emissions, just as we thought they would since it's burning fuel more efficiently. Not rocket science and kind of predictable, but now we have the evidence.
Frank himself raised an eyebrow, and said that if he saw those 2016 figures in isolation, he never would have guessed that they came from a 17-year-old car.
