Gill says if I let her have a Toyota instead of a VW I can build a Falco next.....
I think these photos of the 3 fatalities out of the first 30 built have been putting her off a bit though
Not an aeroplane of the inexperienced.... Just as well it would take me about 15 years to fund and build it....
Sobering thought? Many homebuilders (and in America in particular) have a mentality that oen must always test fly their own aeroplane.
Peer pressure comes in forms like "Jeez thats like chasing a girl for 10 years then lettin' someone else **** her!".
Builders usually haven't done much flying recently (neither time nor money for both), have probably never flown THAT type of aeroplane before either and completely lack the experience to handle worsening situations effectively.
You get airborne, you notice that the airspeed indicator is giving faulty readings. Meanwhile a rigging fault is giving the aeroplane a noticeable one-wing-heavy tendancy, requiring a hefty stick input. The oil temperature is rising fast. You're at 500 feet just crossing the end of the runway. The oil temp is in the red. Smoke from under the instrument panel - Electrical fire! The engine quits.
Who ought to be in the plane at that time? A frantic homebuilder with rusty skills desperate to save his life's work? Or a guy in his late 50's, flying all his life, done many test flights before and has suffered every problem you can imagine?
Personally I don't want to be one of the 3 photos above - hence why someone else is spending the night with my "bride" on the wedding night
I'm going to have my work cut out as it is with an aeroplane I do not know and ahve never flown before - the very least I can do for myself is feel confident that everything works properly!
